Skip to content
WakefieldCountsWakefield, in numbers.Local help →

Wakefield · England

Issues

Wakefield council area. Every figure carries its own date.

Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats drawn from the available evidence. These are analytical judgements, not an official council assessment. Where a national comparison is available, lower housing costs, lower reported poor health and higher qualification shares are treated as relative strengths; this does not prove affordability or service quality.

Strengths

strength

Make room for homes people can afford

Average private rent is £806 a month (August 2026) in Wakefield council area. This is £653 lower than the England average for the same month. Homes rented privately ranged from 8.3% in Airedale & Ferry Fryston to 28.1% in Wakefield North — a gap of 19.8 percentage points.

Housing costs matter most alongside earnings and the number of affordable homes available. A local average cannot tell us whether a particular household can afford its home.

What could help →

Weaknesses

weakness

Keep unsafe rented homes from falling back into disrepair

The Agbrigg programme has identified and removed housing hazards through proactive work with private rentals.

Proposed response: Follow up repairs and make the route for tenants to report unresolved hazards easy to find.

Evidence

What could help →

weakness

Bring support closer to people in poor health

6.5% of people reported bad or very bad health in Wakefield council area (21 March 2021). Across England, the figure was 5.2%. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 4.4% in Stanley & Outwood East to 9.4% in Hemsworth — a gap of 4.9 percentage points.

This is how residents described their health in the census. It can reveal differences between neighbourhoods, but does not diagnose illness or measure current waiting times. Age profiles differ between places, so these shares do not measure service quality.

What could help →

Opportunities

opportunity

Build on Wakefield Exchange without treating the Ridings purchase as regeneration delivered

Wakefield Exchange is open, while purchase of The Ridings is complete and redevelopment planning continues.

The city has one operating cultural hub and a separate redevelopment opportunity. Buying a site does not establish the cost, mix or benefits of its future redevelopment.

What could help →

opportunity

Plan homes and care around an older population

18.8% of people in Wakefield council area were aged 65 or over (21 March 2021). People aged 65 or over ranged from 13.6% in Wakefield East to 23.2% in Horbury & South Ossett — a gap of 9.5 percentage points.

Age alone does not mean poor health or a need for care. Accessible homes, reliable transport and support close to home matter as people get older.

What could help →

opportunity

Connect local skills to local opportunities

24.3% of people aged 16 or over had a degree or equivalent (21 March 2021) in Wakefield council area. Across England, the figure was 33.9%. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 17.8% in Stanley & Outwood East to 32.3% in Airedale & Ferry Fryston — a gap of 14.5 percentage points.

Qualifications show one part of the skills available locally. They do not show whether people have secure jobs or work that uses those skills.

What could help →

opportunity

Target safety work where problems repeat

Mapped police records are available for neighbourhoods in Wakefield council area.

Published locations are approximate and some crimes are not mapped. Counts show recorded incidents, not the chance of an individual becoming a victim.

What could help →

opportunity

Turn published plans into visible progress

3 named local projects or plans have official evidence in this collection.

A published plan makes responsibilities and intentions easier to inspect. It does not prove that funding is secured or that promised benefits have arrived.

What could help →

opportunity

Target support where disadvantages overlap

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 13.7% in Wakefield Rural to 29.4% in Airedale & Ferry Fryston — a gap of 15.7 percentage points.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

What could help →

Threats

The evidence gathered here does not yet support a distinct finding in this category.

Which response goes with each issue?